Should Minors Have Different Facebook Privacy Settings?

A few weeks ago I noticed that the Facebook status updates of a teenage relative were tagged with her approximate location.

FBMinorUpdate

Before I go on, I should disclose that my teenage relatives rarely listen to me when it comes to Facebook.  I’ve accepted that they’re still going to post /those/ photos, use /that/ language and write about /that thing that happened last night.

There are few issues I bring to their attention, but this one struck a nerve: Facebook was posting the location of a 17-year-old girl when she updated her status.  This somehow wasn’t right.

I noticed she was online and started chatting with her:

“Hey, you should disable the geotagging feature on your Facebook status updates.  Everyone can see where you are when you update.”

“Yeah, I’ve tried to take it off, but I can’t.”

Trying to Solve the Problem:

What followed was 60 minutes of she and I, /and my husband/, combing through her privacy settings and trying to figure out how to disable the feature.  In the end, the solution turned out to be much more simple than either of us realized:

Locationsolution

Facebook, Privacy and Minors:

Aside from the common complaints that Facebook’s privacy settings are unnecessarily (or necessarily, depending on what end of the argument you’re on) complicated, it struck me that the default privacy settings are the default privacy settings regardless of the user’s age.

We treat minors differently in nearly every other aspect of civic life because as a society we’ve decided that until an individual reaches 18 years of age they don’t have the ability to understand the consequences of their actions.

If we’ve decided that a 17-year-old can’t get her ears pierced or a tattoo without parental permission because she isn’t able to understand the consequences of her actions, then why wouldn’t we assume the same in regards to online privacy?  While I’m not suggesting parental permission to use Facebook (how would you enforce that?), I am suggesting making it more difficult for minors to share information about themselves, the consequences of which they may not understand.

Make the default privacy settings for anyone under 18 the highest possible.  Don’t allow the profiles to be searchable in Google, don’t make the profiles default to public and remove the geolocation option from their profiles.

Of course, this could all be subverted by a 15-year-old, changing their age on Facebook to 19.  The proverbial “bed sheet rope out the window” after curfew.

Should Facebook have separate default privacy settings for minors?  Is this something that could be policed?

2 thoughts on “Should Minors Have Different Facebook Privacy Settings?

  1. That’s an interesting point, Leslie. As for teens changing their age to get around the default settings, there’s only so much a company (or a family, as in the bed sheet rope example) can do. But setting the default to be MORE protective, well, that’s not really so bad an idea (and arguably is a minor change).

  2. Thanks for weighing in, Jim. I don’t think it would be difficult for Facebook to make that change and, frankly, as we’ve seen, people often don’t know how or aren’t motivated to change their default privacy settings, so it might take.
    How Facebook gathers and uses information minors is a completely different story.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s